Monday, January 25, 2016

Week #2 (1/25-1/29)- 'It's all just poison now': Flint reels as families struggle through water crisis (The Guardian)

Annette Williams is careful to hold her granddaughter Sharell’s head at bath time, to keep the two-year-old from taking a gulp of toxic water. Though most people no longer drink what flows through Flint’s corroded pipes, many families have little choice but to bathe in it.
Sharell has been sick for months – ear infections, skin rashes and coughs. Williams cooks all her meals using bottled water, and has taught the eldest of her three grandchildren, six-year-old Promise, to wash her sister’s face with a flannel. But total isolation is near impossible. Sharell has developed a habit of sucking on her wet towel when no one is looking.
Williams, 48, is terrified of what might happen because the family bathes in the water. Inadequately treated water has coursed into Flint homes at least since April 2014, bringing toxins and poisonous lead that leached off the city’s ageing pipes. There are no safe levels of lead exposure: even low levels can cause lifelong developmental damage to young children.
“I know it’s wrong to do it. We shouldn’t be bathing in it, but what else can we do?” Williams said.
On Monday, all three children will head to hospital for blood tests for toxins . All of Flint’s 8,657 children under the age of six should be considered exposed, according to a recent citywide public health directive.
Since the city’s emergency managers decided to draw Flint’s water from the highly corrosive local river, this small city of 100,000 people – just 70 miles from Michigan’s great lakes, the world’s largest freshwater source – has suffered alone, let down by local, state and federal officials and almost entirely ignored by the rest of America.
Williams can see the river from her living room, in the city’s impoverished north-east. She used to fish for dinner on its banks, but now she can’t bear to look at it.
“It’s all just poison now,” she said.
Steve Deloney carries water which he was using for himself and delivering to his sister.
Pinterest
 Steve Deloney carries water which he was using for himself and delivering to his sister. Photograph: Bryan Mitchell for the Guardian
Life has changed immeasurably in the last two years. Residents live in a state of indignity, fear and paranoia. Some refuse to shower, others eat only from paper plates, and many suffer rashes and hair loss. Adding insult to injury, the city’s water bills are among the highest in the US.
Like 41% of Flint residents, Williams has endured this crisis in poverty; like 56% of residents, she is black. She has no income and hitches rides three days a week to spend precious food stamps on the 70 litres of bottled water that her family needs. Although things have got a little easier since national guard troops rolled into town two weeks ago, supply drops have yet to reach her home. Williams scratched her arms. She “ashes” everyday after showering. She wondered whom to blame.
“I feel the governor let us down,” she said. “We never really knew what was going on.”
Mute
Loaded: 0%
Progress: 0%
Pinterest
 During his state of the state address, Michigan’s governor, Rick Snyder, apologizes for the contaminated drinking water in the city of Flint and says, ‘I’m sorry, and I will fix it.’
Rick Snyder, a Republican who ascended to the governor’s office in 2010 without ever serving in public office, has fought off calls for his resignation and criticism about his delayed response to the crisis. It was Snyder’s administration that placed the city under emergency management in 2011, a decision that wrested control from the city council and imposed cost-cutting – which in turn led the city to the filthy river for water. For 18 months the administration ignored signs that water was contaminated, before finally rerouting supplies last October.
Melissa Mays first noticed something was wrong when yellow water spurted through her taps, two months after the switch. It stank. It made her hair fall out. But still, she, her husband and their three boys drank from the taps when the city assured them nothing was wrong.
In the winter of 2014, her son Christian, then 11 years old, fell from his bike and shattered his wrists, which had become brittle. Mays felt her bones ache too – a sure sign of lead poisoning. She noticed the city had quietly advised residents to boil the water before consuming it, and that a General Motors plant had redirected its water after engine parts started rusting.
All her family later tested positive for heavy metal poisoning. Perversely, Mays feels some of the guilt herself.
flint
Pinterest
 Elijah Waun-Baker, five, left, and Promise Ward, six, wash their faces using tap water. Photograph: Bryan Mitchell for the Guardian
“It comes when Christian wakes up every night and he’s crying, and there’s nothing I can do. I know that somebody else did this, but it was my job to protect him. I didn’t,” she said. “We’re just seeing the early signs of it. It takes up to five years to see the full effects of lead poisoning.”
Advertisement
Her days are dictated by the amount of bottled water she keeps in the house. She washes all the food with it, boils her kettle with it. She instructs her boys to shower sitting down, by pouring warm cups of water quickly over their bodies. The sight of steam from the bathroom makes her jump – she worries it could carry the poison into her body through pores.
•••
Mays was at the state capitol on Tuesday, when a humbled Snyder apologised to residents. He blamed state environment officials, later suspending two employees.
She was far from convinced. “If he was sorry, he’d have come and talked to the citizens,” Mays said. “And we’d have shovels in the ground digging those pipes up.”
A cache of files obtained by the Guardian through a public records request shows several red flags that should have tipped off officials about the water catastrophe.
In February 2015, just weeks after the University of Michigan-Flint reported elevated lead levels on campus, Flint resident Lee-Anne Walters brought the high lead levels in her household’s water to officials’ attention. The federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Michigan’s department of environmental quality (MDEQ) discussed Walters’ lead results in an email later that month.
With the subject line “HIGH LEAD: FLINT Water testing Results”, the EPA’s Jennifer Crooks wrote to local officials that she had been discussing Walters’ “water situation” for several weeks. Crooks was stunned by the results: 104 parts per billion of lead. The EPA’s regulatory limit is 15 parts per billion.
“WOW!!! Did he find the LEAD!” Crooks wrote, adding: “She has 2 children under the age of 3 … Big worries here.”
But state environmental officials felt it was an isolated case. They assuaged the fears of an EPA expert, Miguel Del Toral, by saying the city used corrosion controls to prevent the river from leaching contaminants off the water pipes. Del Toral later confirmed that wasn’t the case in a 25 April email, writing that the “whole town may have much higher lead levels” than state officials believed.
The lack of corrosion control in Flint, he later wrote, was a “major concern from a public health standpoint”.
It would not be until October 2015, when schools reported lead contamination levels as high as 101 parts per billion, that government officials conceded the situation in Flint was a “public safety issue”.
•••
flint
Pinterest
 Eric Davis, 53, shows his dry skin and rash that he believes the water has caused. Photograph: Bryan Mitchell for the Guardian
At a makeshift bottled water collection point, run by a county politician in the city’s north side, a line of cars stretched around the block on Friday. Like refugees from their city, volunteers stuffed cars full of crates. At the eight distribution points manned by the national guard, residents were required to bring identification and could, as of Saturday, collect only one crate per day. The Guardian witnessed several people turned away by troops.
Eric Davis, an unemployed labourer on the city’s north side, stopped drinking the tap water just two months ago. He continues to shower in it and has rashes on his eyelids. The 53-year-old sat in his living room clutching a Red Cross-delivered crate of water, and pointed to the dry skin and bloody scratches on his knees and arms.
“My skin ain’t never been like this,” he said. “My body feels contaminated. It feels like they trying to kill us out here.”
His flatmate, 58-year-old Jeffrey Moore, has refused to shower for two weeks. Instead, he boils water and wipes it over his body. “We’re alone out here,” he said.
A few blocks away, Randy Huyck, his wife and six children shared the feeling of isolation. Their two-storey house, with leaking pipes and rancid mould, was deemed uninhabitable by the city, and the family faces eviction. Abandoned or burned houses line their street, evidence of the city’s declining population and economic collapse.
Huyck continues to bathe and cook with the water.
Advertisement
“I can’t afford to buy water,” he said. “With six kids and no money coming in, I don’t know what I’m supposed to do.”
Until a few weeks ago, with a Michigan primary looming in March, Flint’s water crisis was barely acknowledged on the US presidential campaign trail or in the national media. Earlier this month, Hillary Clinton called the delayed response by Michigan officials “unconscionable”, and Bernie Sanders has repeatedly called for Snyder to resign. On Sunday, Jeb Bush praised Synder “for stepping up right now”. His rivals in the chaotic Republican race have kept silent.
On Thursday, Barack Obama announced $80m in aid for the people of Flint. “Our children should not have to be worried about the water that they’re drinking in American cities,” he said. “That’s not something that we should accept.”
But residents here fear the money will never reach them, and are angered that Obama chose not to visit the city during a trip to Detroit this week.
•••
flint
Pinterest
 Grant Porter, five, reacts as his mother Ardis Porter, 26, tries to comfort him while having his blood drawn to be tested for lead. Photograph: Bryan Mitchell for the Guardian
At the Masonic temple in downtown Flint on Saturday, hundreds of residents arrived to test their bodies for lead. The testing kits, paid for not by the government but by a local lawyer, ran out within an hour.
Ardis Porter, 26, and her five-year-old son, Grant, got here early enough to see a nurse. They stopped using tap water to brush their teeth only two weeks ago. Grant, whose hair started falling out in November, cried as the needle pierced his skin. Ardis worries her unborn child may also have been exposed.
“They should be testing everybody because they’ve exposed us all to this,” said Ardis Porter. “It wouldn’t be handled like this in other areas. People don’t care about the poor.”

Tuesday, January 19, 2016

Week #1 (1/19-1/22)- The Trump-Cruz feud gets nasty (BBC)


Trump supporter's capImage copyrightReuters
Speaking before a crowd of more than 11,000 students and locals at Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia, Donald Trump made no mention of Texas Senator Ted Cruz.
It was practically the first time he'd stopped talking about his presidential rival in the week since their once chummy relationship soured amid a flurry of exchanged insults and questioned political credentials.
Despite a storm of tweets over the weekend blasting Mr Cruz and a round of insult-laden television interviews on Sunday, it's perhaps not surprising that Mr Trump held his tongue at the university founded by the late evangelical leader Jerry Falwell in 1971.
Both Mr Cruz and Mr Trump are battling for the sizeable religious conservative vote in Iowa - which holds its first-in-the-nation presidential caucuses in two weeks - and it's a crowd that Mr Cruz usually seems more comfortable with.
Last March, Texas Senator Ted Cruz launched his bid for the Republican presidential nomination at Liberty University, speaking intimately about his faith and his father, a firebrand evangelical pastor.
Mr Trump, on the other hand, doesn't quite have the same religious bona fides, despite his best attempts. Last September, he proudly held up his childhood Bible at the Values Voter Summit in Washington, DC. And at one point during his hour-long speech at Liberty, he tried to cite a biblical passage about faith and liberty.
Trump holding BibleImage copyrightAP
Image captionThe Bible has been brandished several times
Unfortunately for Mr Trump, he referenced "Two Corinthians" instead of "Second Corinthians".
The crowd laughed.
"I always think it's entertaining when people try to throw the Bible into their speeches," Josh Schumacher, a student in his third year at Liberty, said after the speech. "I think it's sometimes just a ploy to get us to buy into what they're saying."
Mr Trump did benefit from a glowing introduction from Liberty University President Jerry Falwell Jr, however, who praised the businessman as one of the "greatest visionaries of our time" and likened him to his famous father.
"Trump can't be bought," he said. "He's not a puppet on a string like so many other candidates."
Students prayingImage copyrightAFP
Image captionLiberty University is a Christian institution
That could be read as a tacit boost of Mr Trump over Mr Cruz, as Mr Trump has recently attacked the Texas senator for being in the thrall of his big-ticket campaign donors.
Once upon a time, Mr Cruz and Mr Trump had nothing but kind words for each other. Mr Cruz invited Mr Trump to join him in speaking at a rally in front of the US Capitol, protesting the US-Iran nuclear arms agreement.
And while other candidates criticised the businessman for his call to temporarily close the US border to all Muslims, Mr Cruz was more restrained.
Mr Cruz said he wouldn't engage in a "cage match" with Mr Trump, tweeting that the New Yorker was "terrific".
But as the Iowa caucuses approach, and Mr Cruz and Mr Trump are locked in a battle for first place according to polls, the sparks have flown.
Trump and Cruz at debateImage copyrightGetty Images
Image captionHis ceasefire with Cruz broke publicly at the Republican debate last week
For the past week, Mr Trump has questioned Mr Cruz's eligibility for the presidency, given that he was born of an American mother on Canadian soil.
Mr Cruz has returned fire, saying Mr Trump embraces the liberal values of his New York City home town. Their acrimony was one of the headlines of the Republican presidential debate last Thursday.
Since then Trump has attacked the senator as a hypocrite and a "nasty man".
"Nobody likes him anywhere once they get to know him," Mr Trump said on Sunday. "He's got an edge that's not good. You can't make deals with people like that."
Mr Cruz responded on Monday by comparing Mr Trump unfavourably to conservative patron saint Ronald Reagan and saying he is unqualified for the presidency.
Dylan Engel
Image captionDylan Engel said the feud is upetting
David Barton, who chairs a group supporting Mr Cruz, went one step further.
"Donald Trump's about-face, negative attacks on Ted Cruz are proof he has neither the temperament nor judgement to lead our country," he said in a statement. "It proves Trump is the ultimate opportunist."
Dylan Engel, Liberty student, said that he supports both Mr Cruz and Mr Trump, and finds the growing rivalry between the two upsetting.
"I like how outspoken Trump is," he said. "I believe today we need to fight political correctness. We're being torn apart from the inside."
He added, however, that he's impressed that Mr Cruz hasn't backed down from Mr Trump's attacks.
"Ted Cruz stood his ground," he said.
It seems the Trump-Cruz battle is just warming up.

Week #1 (1/19-1/22)- IRAN'S PRESIDENT ROUHANI CELEBRATES END OF SANCTIONS (Reuters)

2016-01-17T085147Z_2_LYNXNPEC0G071_RTROPTP_4_IRAN-ELECTION
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani (C) waves after he registered for February's election of the Assembly of Experts, the clerical body that chooses the supreme leader, at the Interior Ministry in Tehran December 21, 2015. He has called the nuclear deal a "turning point" for Iran.REUTERS/RAHEB HOMAVANDI/TIMA
President Hassan Rouhani hailed on Sunday a nuclear deal with world powers as a "golden page" in Iran's history, and looked forward to an economic future less dependent on oil as the country emerges from years of sanctions and isolation.
But in an address to parliament he noted bitter opposition to Saturday's lifting of economic curbs from arch foe Israel, some members of the U.S. Congress and what he called "warmongers" in the region - an apparent reference to some of  Iran 's Gulf Arab adversaries.
Iran ended years of economic isolation when world powers lifted the crippling sanctions against the Islamic Republic on Saturday in return for Tehran complying with a deal to curb its nuclear ambitions.
Presenting the draft budget for the next Iranian fiscal year, which begins in March, Rouhani told parliament the deal was a "turning point" for the economy of  Iran, a major oil producer which has been virtually shut out of international markets for the past five years.
"The nuclear negotiations which succeeded by the guidance of the Supreme Leader and support of our nation, were truly a golden page in Iran's history," he said.
"The nuclear deal is an opportunity that we should use to develop the country, improve the welfare of the nation, and create stability and security in the region," Rouhani said.
In a dramatic move which coincided with the scrapping of the sanctions, Tehran also announced the release of five Americans including Washington Post reporter Jason Rezaian as part of a prisoner swap with the United States.
Together, the lifting of sanctions and the prisoner deal help to ease the hostility between Tehran and Washington that has shaped the Middle East since Iran 's 1979 Islamic Revolution.
Tens of billions of dollars' worth of  Iranian assets will now be unfrozen and global companies that have been barred from doing business there will be able to exploit a market hungry for everything from automobiles to airplane parts.
CROWNING ACHIEVEMENT FOR ROUHANI
However, America's thaw with Iran  is viewed with deep suspicion by U.S. Republicans as well as allies of Washington in the Middle East, including Israel and Saudi Arabia. U.S.- Iranian suspicion still remains deeply entrenched.
Israel's opposition was evident in a statement from the office of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Saturday night.
"Even after the signing of the nuclear agreement, Iran has not abandoned its aspirations to acquire nuclear weapons, and continues to act to destabilize the Middle East and spread terrorism throughout the world while violating its international commitments," the statement said.
Rouhani took a swipe at its critics. "Everybody is happy except the Zionists, the warmongers who are fuelling sectarian war among the Islamic nation, and the hardliners in the U.S. congress," he said.
The International Atomic Energy Agency ruled on Saturday that Iran had abided by an agreement last year with six world powers to curtail its nuclear program, triggering the end of sanctions.
IAEA chief Yukiya Amano will travel to Tehran on Sunday to meet Rouhani and the head of the Atomic Energy Organisation of  Iran , the IAEA said on Saturday. Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif was also back in Tehran by Sunday.
Minutes after the IAEA's ruling, the United States formally lifted banking, steel, shipping and other sanctions on Iran. The European Union likewise ended all nuclear-related economic and financial sanctions against the country.
The IAEA's confirmation that Iran had fulfilled its commitments under the nuclear deal also automatically ended most United Nations sanctions on the country.
MORE MONEY, PRESTIGE FOR  IRAN
The end of sanctions means more money and prestige for Shi'ite Muslim Iran as it becomes deeply embroiled in the sectarian conflicts of the Middle East, notably in the Syrian civil war where its allies are facing Sunni Muslim rebels.
It is also a crowning achievement for Rouhani, a pragmatic cleric elected in 2013 in a landslide on a promise to reduce Iran's international isolation.
Iran denies its nuclear program was aimed at obtaining an atomic bomb. Washington maintains separate, less comprehensive sanctions on Iran over its missile program.
Britain welcomed the deal's implementation, as did France which said it would keep a close eye out to ensure that Iran 's nuclear deal with diplomatic powers is strictly respected. Japan plans to lift most of its sanctions against Iran, including a halt to fresh investments in Iranian oil and gas projects, "within a few days", a Foreign Ministry official said.
Besides the ban on new investments in the Iranian energy sector, part of Tokyo's asset freeze measures against Iranian individuals and groups that are involved in nuclear activities will also be lifted, he said.
In Washington, President Barack Obama pardoned three Iranian-Americans charged with violating sanctions against Iran, a lawyer for one of the men said, while prosecutors moved to drop charges against four Iranians outside the United States.
Iran agreed to free five Americans including Rezaian and Saeed Abedini, an Iranian-American Christian pastor sentenced to eight years in prison in 2013 on charges of undermining Iran's national security.
The prisoner deal was the culmination of months of diplomatic contacts, secret talks and legal maneuvering which came close to falling apart because of a threat by Washington in December to impose fresh sanctions on Iran for recent ballistic missile tests.
(Additional reporting by Sam Wilkin in Dubai, Kiyoshi Takenaka in Tokyo, Dan Williams in Jerusalem; Writing by Yara Bayoumy, Editing by William Maclean and David Stamp)

Week #1 (1/19-1/22)- Sweet welcome home: Rams football team returns to L.A. for 2016 season (Los Angeles Times)

HOUSTON, Texas — For 21 years, Los Angeles, California, has not had its own professional football team. Many have tried to bring a team to the county, but one plan after another has collapsed. 
Now, at last, the wait is over. On Tuesday a group of National Football League owners voted to allow the St. Louis Rams to leave Missouri and move to Los Angeles for the 2016 season. The owners also voted to give the San Diego Chargers an option to join the Rams in Inglewood, a city in the greater Los Angeles area.
The Rams' new home will be on the site of the old Hollywood Park racetrack in Inglewood. It will be the league’s biggest stadium. Due to open in 2019, it could end up costing as much as $3 billion.
The NFL owners met in a hotel to vote on rival proposals. In finding a way to return professional football to Los Angeles, they succeeded where a succession of local leaders and billionaires had failed.
The owners voted on two proposals. Both involved relocating two teams to cities in Los Angeles County, with both sets of teams to share a newly built stadium. One proposed plan was to move the Chargers and the Oakland Raiders to Carson. The other plan was to move the Rams and a team to be determined to Inglewood. 

Chargers Are Likely Partner For Rams

In the end, the Inglewood proposal won out, 30-2. The Chargers were named as the team likely to share the new stadium with the Rams.
Forging the deal meant bringing together Rams owner Stan Kroenke and Chargers owner Dean Spanos. Spanos previously favored the Carson plan, and the two men had resisted a partnership for the better part of last year.
Developers envision transforming the 298-acre Inglewood site into a multibillion-dollar entertainment, shopping and housing site. The stadium and a performing arts venue will be the centerpiece of the site.
The new stadium will have 70,240 seats. For large events, it will also be able to add an extra 30,000 people in standing-room-only areas.
In addition to regular season games, the stadium is expected to host special events such as college basketball’s Final Four and the NFL Pro Bowl. Designers plan to make the building 175 feet tall.

Temporary Home In Coliseum

The design calls for a roof with an area over the playing field made of a strong transparent material. The stadium will be open on the sides, to let in air.
Until the stadium is complete, the Rams are expected to play temporarily at the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum. If the Chargers join them, it is unclear where they will play, though the NFL says Angel Stadium, Dodger Stadium and the Rose Bowl are all possible choices.
In the last several days, fellow owners worked behind the scenes to bring Kroenke and Spanos together. Their new agreement allows them to be equal partners in the Inglewood stadium. Right now, the only shared stadium in the NFL is in East Rutherford, New Jersey, which is home to the New York Giants and Jets.
The NFL’s long absence from Los Angeles was not for lack of trying. There were dozens of proposals for new stadiums, to be built in a range of locations throughout Los Angeles and Orange counties.

Multiple Plans, Without Success

There were numerous plans for stadiums in downtown Los Angeles, none of which got off the ground. As the failed plans piled up, the city's quest became so seemingly hopeless that the NFL’s return to the city became a running joke. 
Four mayors and numerous other political leaders tried to bring football back to Los Angeles, with no luck. There were plans by high-powered businessmen such as Eli Broad, Peter O’Malley, Ed Roski and Casey Wasserman. Even stars like Garth Brooks, Tom Cruise and Magic Johnson lent their names to various failed efforts.
Over two years, more than half the league’s 32 teams were linked to plans to move to Los Angeles.

Momentum Changed With Land Purchase

Things finally changed in January 2014, when Kroenke bought 60 acres of land for an estimated $101 million next to 238 acres of the Hollywood Park site. The Hollywood Park site is owned by San Francisco-based developer Stockbridge Capital. 
Later in 2014, Kroenke and Stockbridge Capital agreed to combine their properties and work together on a mixed-used development with the stadium at the center. The site’s developers say between 125 and 150 architects have been working full-time since mid-2014 on the stadium project. The plan was designed by the architectural firm HKS Inc.
All of the site’s previous structures have been demolished except for the casino. Even that building will be torn down once its replacement is finished nearby. 
Developers have said stadium construction can start as quickly as two weeks after they receive league approval.

Week #1 (1/19-1/22)- U.K. PM DAVID CAMERON: MIGRANTS MUST LEARN TO SPEAK ENGLISH (Newsweek)

Migrants who fail to improve their English could lose the chance to stay in Britain under new plans.
Writing in The Times on Monday, U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron launched a new push to better integrate Muslim women into British society.

“Consider this: New figures show that some 190,000 British Muslim women—or 22 percent—speak little or no English despite many having lived here for decades,” Cameron said. “So it’s no surprise that 60 percent of women of a Pakistani or Bangladeshi heritage are economically inactive.”
A new £20 million ($28.5 million) push to make English classes for migrants better will be matched by sanctions on those who do not improve their language skills, it was reported elsewhere in the paper. Officials said that from October, people arriving in Britain on spouse visas will have to develop their English, with a test after 2.5 years.
“There are no plans to remove migrants who fail to reach the required level, but it would be taken into account in any request to extend visas or apply for permanent residence,” one official told the paper.
Muslim group the Ramadhan Foundation accused Cameron of using Muslims as a “political football to score cheap points,” The Guardian reports. “The irony of the prime minister calling for more resources to help migrants learn English when his government cut the funding for English classes in 2011 has not been lost on many people,” it added.
Naz Shah, a Muslim member of parliament for the opposition Labour party, welcomed the plans: “Too many children in Bradford and elsewhere are starting school with no English because it is not spoken at home, and that has a knock-on effect for their education. Early years education starts in the home.” But Shah also pointed out that Cameron’s government has cut funding for English teaching.
A report released last year by the Muslim Council of Britain found that 6 percent of British Muslims said they struggle to speak English.
In his article, which comes in the wake of sex attacks allegedly committed by migrants in Cologne, Germany, and widespread concern about the impact of mass migration to Europe, Cameron warned of a “passive tolerance” that he says allows different communities to live “parallel” lives within western nations. “Segregation drives us apart, not together,” he said.
“We will never truly build one nation unless we are more assertive about our liberal values, clearer about the expectations we place on those who come to live here and build our country together, and more creative and generous in the work we do to break down barriers,” he said.
Cameron added that this new integration drive has a partial national security focus in combating domestic extremism: “I am not saying separate development or conservative religious practices directly cause extremism... But they can help a young person’s slide towards radicalization,” he said.