The deadly Paris attacks are putting pressure on President Obama to confront Islamic State militants more aggressively than he has been willing to consider in the past, opening a difficult deliberation for a leader who has tried to build a legacy on ending America's wars, not extending them.
On Sunday, Obama pledged to “redouble our efforts” to fight international terrorism after the brutal bombings and shootings that killed at least 129 people in the French capital.
Obama mentioned fortifying borders and continuing diplomatic talks, but that strategy is likely to evolve and get tougher as world leaders gather in Turkey for the annual Group of 20 economic summit — an event transformed by the terrorist strikes into an emergency strategy session on combating Islamic State.
After a meeting with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan here Sunday morning, Obama condemned the mass killings as “an attack on the civilized world” and pledged to “stand in solidarity” with French authorities as they hunt down the perpetrators.
The attacks have created a new level of anxiety among European and Middle Eastern leaders as they watch Islamic State extend its ambitions beyond Iraq and Syria to target enemies internationally.
The Paris attacks came just a few days after the bombing of a Shiite Muslim district of Beirut and two weeks after the sudden crash of a Russian airliner. Islamic State has claimed responsibility for all three events, which targeted elements that have been fighting Islamic State on what it views as its home turf.
World leaders are looking again to the U.S. for leadership in the campaign to defeat the militant group. Erdogan is just one of the regional partners who wants the U.S. to send in more ground troops and special operations forces to help coordinate airstrikes.
Others are pushing for a no-fly zone to stop air operations by the government of Syrian President Bashar Assad. Supporters of the move say it would protect Syrian civilians and demonstrate that the West remains committed to defeating the Syrian dictator, thereby undercutting a powerful Islamic State recruiting narrative.
Obama has been resistant to the idea of sinking more deeply into the Syrian civil war, but there are signs that approach could be changing. Defense Secretary Ashton Carter vowed to his French counterpart that the U.S. would take “additional steps” to respond to the Paris attacks.
But after a morning of meetings, White House officials also made it clear that they plan to prod coalition members to do more of what they had already pledged to do within the context of the existing strategy against Islamic State. The administration expects “some of our allies, including France, to intensify their efforts” and allocate more resources toward the coalition strategy, deputy national security advisor Ben Rhodes told reporters in Antalya on Sunday.
With some intelligence help from the U.S., French warplanes hit Islamic State targets in Syria on Sunday night, the start of what the French government promises will be a stepped-up military campaign.
Obama still doesn’t think that more U.S. troops are the answer to the problem, Rhodes said. Instead, the situation calls for a “more sustainable opposition force on the ground in Syria and partners in Iraq,” he said.
With an invasion force off the table, the other options are mainly to continue bombing and targeting terrorist leaders while waiting for the Kurds and Syrian forces to get strong enough to tackle Islamic State, also known as ISIS and ISIL.
It was not immediately clear what additional steps Carter meant, but they probably would include intelligence-sharing and closer coordination, such as the assistance offered in Sunday’s retaliatory strike by French warplanes.
Frederic C. Hof, a former special advisor to Obama on Syria who now is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, a think tank in Washington, said the U.S. may need to consider mounting a ground offensive with Western European support to go after Islamic State in Syria. He said the militants cannot be defeated by only an air campaign.
“These horrific attacks and ISIS' claim of responsibility suggest that the administration may have to go back to the drawing board on its assumption that the battle against this organization must, by definition, be a long one,” he said. “ISIS in its Syrian headquarters needs to be taken down, and quickly.”
Friday's attacks also “raise hard questions for us and France about how this went undiscovered,” said Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Burbank), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, in a phone interview Saturday after a briefing by U.S. intelligence officials. He added that the intelligence agencies are reviewing the information they had leading up to the attack in order to see whether any signs were missed.
If the Paris attacks turn out to have been directed by Islamic State's central leadership, it would mark a “big change” in the group's strategy, said William McCants, an expert on Islamic extremism at the Brookings Institution.
Islamic State has focused on state-building in Iraq and Syria in the last year and “has not dedicated a lot of resources to external operations,” McCants said in an interview. Most Islamic State attacks outside the region up until now have been carried out by affiliated groups or individuals who were inspired to act by Islamic State propaganda.
“The calculation has been, by the U.S. and other governments, that as long as Islamic State focuses on state-building in Iraq, it is enough to contain them,” McCants said. “But if Islamic State has begun successful large-scale external attacks, I think it will increase the popular demand for much larger-scale interventions.”
Much of the pressure could come from European allies.
“France has declared this an act of war,” said James Jeffrey, a former ambassador in both Turkey and Iraq and now an analyst with the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. “I do not think [French President Francois] Hollande's response will be to continue his minor air force contribution to Obama's very cautious limited containment campaign.”
“Hollande,” he added, “will not just go along with Obama's game plan.”
Obama heard from other world leaders Sunday as European and Middle East heads of state gathered for a day of meetings. He met with Saudi King Salman, an emergency get-together announced after the Paris attacks.
On Monday he will hold a previously scheduled meeting with European allies to talk about fighting Islamic State as well as dealing with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s moves in Syria and Ukraine.
White House officials counted it a minor step forward that Obama met for half an hour Sunday with Putin in a pull-aside chat at the G-20. The two “agreed on the need for a Syrian-led and Syrian-owned political transition” that would come after a cease-fire and negotiations mediated by the United Nations, according to a White House written account of the conversation.
Obama said he “welcomes efforts by all nations” to confront Islamic State and noted the importance of Russia's military efforts in Syria focusing on the group, an aide wrote.
At home, federal law enforcement agencies are stepping up their surveillance efforts of potential Islamic States operatives, growing increasingly concerned that after the Paris attacks and a plane bombing in Egypt that the militant group may next strike in the United States.
According to two federal law enforcement officials on Sunday, the FBI is enhancing its wiretap efforts and other surveillance programs in an attempt to follow potential suspects through their phone and Internet networks.
Parsons reported from Antalya and Hennigan and Bennett from Washington. Times staff writers Richard A. Serrano and Katherine Skiba in Washington contributed to this report.
In my opinion Obama should have fixed this war a long time ago. Whether it was a violent approach or not. Sending more troops for man hunts or more funds for weapons. In my opinion I don't really care about the french, they hate the American people and don't appreciate us even though they would be speaking German if it wasn't for us right now.
ReplyDeleteThere has been ISIS activity all over the world, however, this particular attack has gotten much more publicity because it is on a greater scale. Obama should take this as a sign that he needs to give more attention to these attacks, and it seems like he is going to when he said “redouble our efforts” referring how the US is going to respond to this attack(Obama). -Truman Andrus, Period 6
ReplyDeleteI don't think that Obama should get anymore involved with this as he already is. ISIS activity is everywhere, if we want to stop them once and for all then we must all come together to fight this common cause. I understand about trying to help other countries but we need to focus on our own problems before we help others with theirs. "On Sunday, Obama pledged to “redouble our efforts” to fight international terrorism after the brutal bombings and shootings that killed at least 129 people in the French capital". We don't need to get involved as much as we already are and do not need to double our efforts to stopping this international problem. -Ryan Brown Period 2
ReplyDeleteI believe that Obama needs to be more aggressive against ISIS. America needs to unite with France to bomb ISIS. This act doesn't kill random civilians, it kills where the ISIS members are located. As Ryan Brown said in his statement above about Obama and how he disagrees with him, I completely disagree. We need to be on the offensive side, and not waiting to do something after tragedy hits the US.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Ryan America has this goal that will never be reached that George W. Bush said "We will end terrorism". It is impossible to end terrorism there will always be terrorism it is inevitable we can slow it down but we cannot stop it. We could use some tweaking to slow it down because the army agrees that it takes to long to get conformation to bomb which lets Isis gain time to flee.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete"The deadly Paris attacks are putting pressure on President Obama to confront Islamic State militants more aggressively than he has been willing to consider in the past, opening a difficult deliberation for a leader who has tried to build a legacy on ending America's wars, not extending them." I think that it's smart that he is trying to end American wars. However, other countries may force us to go to war so I think he needs to be prepared or anything. I like to hear that he is trying to avoid casualties and another huge war, and that he is doing everything in his power to not get to involved. Pray for Paris and hope this doesn't happen to anyone else.
ReplyDelete"The deadly Paris attacks are putting pressure on President Obama to confront Islamic State militants more aggressively than he has been willing to consider in the past, opening a difficult deliberation for a leader who has tried to build a legacy on ending America's wars, not extending them." I think that it's smart that he is trying to end American wars. However, other countries may force us to go to war so I think he needs to be prepared or anything. I like to hear that he is trying to avoid casualties and another huge war, and that he is doing everything in his power to not get to involved. Pray for Paris and hope this doesn't happen to anyone else.
ReplyDeleteObama, once again, has screwed up. He talks about how fighting ISIS has costs and their is no need to fight them, yet thousands have died by the hands of them. We need to fight them before they attack us instead of waiting for it to happen. They have already attacked Russia, France, and Syria and he thinks they are going to stop there? Obama will just wait until a terror attack actually does happen to our own country before he takes action. We would have Britain, France, Israel, and Russia on our side on the fight against ISIS but he still wont do anything. I don't understand.
ReplyDeleteAfter reading this article I realized that we should be thankful for where we live and how we should take life for granted. It's sad to think that the people in Paris didn't even do anything wrong and were at a concert little did they know such a awful thing was going to go down. Also, I think Obama should be more considerate of the family's and should not be bringing in a lot of Syrian prisoners into America because it will cause threats and other country's getting mad. So I think that Obama should try an do something to Isis and stop them rather than helping other citizens.
ReplyDelete-Nico Gardey p1
I think that we need to use force in order to stop ISIS. It may be the only way. I think that many countries: Russia, Holland, France, Turkey, U.S.A, England, Ukraine, and many others, need to band together and fight ISIS together. Yes, I understand that we haven't, and maybe still don't, get along with all these countries. They may not get along with each other, either. However, if we can come together on this one thing, and forget disagreements for now, we can defeat ISIS. I really like the quote, "Obama said he “welcomes efforts by all nations” to confront Islamic State..." (Christi Parsons, W.J. Hennigan and Brian Bennett Contact Reporters)
ReplyDeleteI believe it's good that Obama is trying to stop the war, but I think we should still be prepared for anything that can happen. Although he is trying to stop it, other countries can still attack at any given time. "The deadly Paris attacks are putting pressure of President Obama to confront Islamic state militants more aggressively then he has been willing to consider in the past, opening a difficult deliberation for a leader who has tried to build a legacy on ending America's wars, not extending them." (paragraph 1) To hear that Obama is doing anything he can to stop the war is a positive thing. We all should still be open minded because anything can happen.
ReplyDeleteI think that it is about time that Obama tries to keep the war from happening but i also know that they will do whatever they can to get into america and start a war. Look what happened in Paris they got attacked and they never even knew that it was coming. But at least Obama is finally trying to keep the war from happening here and in other countries. Our military and government still needs to be prepared for the worst is what it comes down too.
ReplyDeleteRecently the Paris shootings really devastated people all around the world. It really made everyone mad and sad for what happened to the poor people at the concert who were just there to have a good time and then something horrific went down while they were there. I think the people should not try to hold back their feelings in the memorial area just because they think somebody will do something to them again. Its sad to think that the people are now scared to show their emotions to the world just because there are threats from the same people that did the attack in the concert hall.
ReplyDelete-nico
After reading the article about ISIS and the horrific attacks they claimed to be theirs, I was disgruntled by the fact that we obviously are not doing enough to stop this cowardice group. I think we should put more boots on the ground and wipe out ISIS's presence in the middle east. Doing this will affect the sleeper cells that are claimed to be inside most countries. If we take out the source, the rest is easy.
ReplyDelete